The Journal of Academic Leadership
Graduate Student/Practitioner Division
Scoring Guide
Manuscript #:_______
|
Catergory |
Unacceptable
1 |
Poor
2 |
Average
3 |
Good
4 |
Excellent
5 |
Comments |
Alignment
(Does the article reflect the value system of the journal?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timeliness of Subject
(Do educators need to be aware of the overall concepts and ideas of this article?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar
(Does the article contain acceptable headings, punctuation, and usage?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readability
(Does the article contain a clear and scholarly flow?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insightfulness
(Does the article make a significant contribution to a field of academic leadership?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originality
(Does the author represent a new thought or new way of looking at a familiar thought?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readership Interest
(Would the article be of interest to a variety of readers?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Quality of Article |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendation for Publication
-
Publish As is:____
-
Publish with Regard to Minor Revisions (Provide Explanation in “Comments” Section):____
-
Revise and Resubmit Manuscript for New Review (Provide Explanation in “Comments” Section):____
-
Not Recommended for Publication(Provide Explanation in “Comments” Section):____
-
Send to Another Journal for Publication (Provide Explanation in “Comments” Section):____
Additional Comments:_______________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
